From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosemin v. Oved

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 13, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom the provision which denied those branches of the appellants' motion which were for summary judgment on the plaintiff's Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence causes of action, and substituting therefor a provision granting those branches of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff was an employee of the appellants' subcontractor, which was hired to lay a foundation for a building. He was injured when he tripped and fell over a piece of wood at the construction site where he was preparing to pour the foundation.

The plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue regarding the appellants' actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition which caused his injury ( see, Devodier v. Haas, 173 A.D.2d 437), or that the appellants exercised supervisory control over the work performed by the plaintiff ( see, Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 N.Y.2d 494; see also, Allen v. Cloutier Constr. Corp., 44 N.Y.2d 290). Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in denying summary judgment to the appellants on the common-law negligence and Labor Law § 200 causes of action.

Contrary to the appellants' further contention that the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based upon Labor Law § 241 (6), the evidence in the record presents a question of fact as to whether the appellants had violated the section of the industrial Code which requires that working areas must be kept free from accumulations of dirt, "debris, tools, and materials insofar as may be consistent with the work performed ( see, 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 [e] [2]; Samiani v. New York State Elec. Gas Corp., 199 A.D.2d 796). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment on the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action.

Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosemin v. Oved

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1998
254 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Rosemin v. Oved

Case Details

Full title:JUNIOR P. ROSEMIN, Respondent, v. ISAAC OVED et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 70

Citing Cases

YIP v. KIT TZING LEE KUAN REALTY, INC.

Plaintiff further testified that Kit did not exercise supervision and control over the work site and that Kit…

Walker v. Ekleco, Co.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The defendants established their prima facie entitlement…