From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roselle v. East Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 11, 1962
181 A.2d 751 (N.J. 1962)

Opinion

Argued June 4, 1962 —

Decided June 11, 1962.

Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division.

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Budd, Larner Kent, attorneys).

Mr. William P. Reiss argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. William L. Brach, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the trial court in an opinion reported under the name of Greggio v. Orange, 69 N.J. Super. 453 (1961).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Roselle v. East Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 11, 1962
181 A.2d 751 (N.J. 1962)
Case details for

Roselle v. East Orange

Case Details

Full title:PIETRO ROSELLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 11, 1962

Citations

181 A.2d 751 (N.J. 1962)
181 A.2d 751

Citing Cases

Muccio v. Cronin

The intention to effect a change in substance must be expressed in language excluding a reasonable doubt * *…

Henderson v. N.J. Bd., Exam'rs of Elec. Cont'rs

It is fundamental that when the Legislature delegates to an administrative agency the discretionary power to…