From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Montgomery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

May, 1925.


Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The learned trial court erred in its charge to the jury relating to punitive damages. ( Distin v. Rose, 69 N.Y. 122; Willard v. Press Publishing Co., 52 App. Div. 448.) There was error also in the charge that the jury might consider the justification pleaded by way of defense in determining whether the defendant uttered the slander. In view of the closeness of the issue on the question of fact, we do not think these errors can be overlooked. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rose v. Montgomery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Rose v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:RITA ROSE, Respondent, v. JAMES MONTGOMERY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1925

Citations

214 App. Div. 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)