From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosario v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 2001
289 A.D.2d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

5706

December 20, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered October 11, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant New York City Housing Authority's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

SCOTT SESSLER, for plaintiff-respondent.

NEIL R. FINKSTON, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Rubin, Saxe, JJ.


In this personal injury action, arising from a trip and fall on a public sidewalk abutting premises owned by defendant Housing Authority, sufficient evidence was presented to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the Housing Authority made special use of the driveway portion of the sidewalk where plaintiff fell. The Housing Authority's own witness testified that Housing Authority vehicles, and only Housing Authority vehicles, regularly drove up onto the sidewalk portion of the driveway to gain access to the property. This testimony also raised a triable issue as to whether the described use of the sidewalk by Housing Authority vehicles caused the sidewalk defect alleged to have caused plaintiff's harm (see, Peretich v. City of New York, 263 A.D.2d 410).

In addition, plaintiff's testimony that the defect in the sidewalk that caused him to trip was a hole, three to five inches wide and three to five inches deep, together with the photographs of the accident site, establish that the defect was not so trivial as to be non-actionable as a matter of law (see, Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 N.Y.2d 976).

We have considered the Housing Authority's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Rosario v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 2001
289 A.D.2d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Rosario v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:BERNABE ROSARIO, plaintiff-respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 133 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 50

Citing Cases

Vyadro v. City of New York

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff payable by the defendant A-Club Driving School,…

Torres v. Raghunandan

In the absence of any indication that Raghunandan used the driveway prior to the accident, a finding that a…