From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROSA v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 5, 1982
412 So. 2d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-711.

March 23, 1982. Rehearing Denied May 5, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Murray Goldman, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robin H. Greene, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.


We reverse defendant Rosa's conviction of second-degree murder upon our holding that the photograph of the deceased's blood-spattered body, which depicted the results of emergency procedures performed after the stabbing, including protruding surgical tubes and sutures, was irrelevant. Dyken v. State, 89 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1956); Beagles v. State, 273 So.2d 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); see Booker v. State, 397 So.2d 910 (Fla. 1981); Leach v. State, 132 So.2d 329 (Fla. 1962).

In addition, we find error in the trial court's failure to state its reasons for retaining jurisdiction over defendant Rosa pursuant to section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1979).

Defendant's remaining point lacks merit.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

ROSA v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 5, 1982
412 So. 2d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

ROSA v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO JUAN ROSA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 5, 1982

Citations

412 So. 2d 891 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Having been furnished nothing other than the motion and the order denying same, we must reverse the order…

Waggoner v. State

Admission of photographs appears to be reversible error only when the photographs have little or no relevance…