From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosa M. v. Francisco P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 6, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

4171

06-06-2017

In re Rosa M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Francisco P., Respondent-Respondent.

Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant. Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, attorney for the child.


Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.

Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, attorney for the child.

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Gail A. Adams, Referee), entered on or about February 8, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, modified a visitation order to provide for overnight visitation with the parties' child every Wednesday until April 14, 2016, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The temporary visitation order is not an order of disposition and thus not appealable as of right (see Family Ct Act § 1112[a]; Matter of Holtzman v Holtzman, 47 AD2d 620 [1st Dept 1975]), and we decline to review it (see id.). Moreover, the appeal is moot, as the temporary order has already expired (see Matter of Sasha B. [Erica B.], 73 AD3d 587, 587 [1st Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 16 NY3d 755 [2011]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 6, 2017

CLERK


Summaries of

Rosa M. v. Francisco P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 6, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Rosa M. v. Francisco P.

Case Details

Full title:In re Rosa M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Francisco P.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 6, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)