From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ronga v. Chiusano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1983
97 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

November 7, 1983


In an action pursuant to article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law to set aside certain payments made by defendant Michael Chiusano on the ground that they constituted fraudulent conveyances, and to impress a constructive trust upon real property, which action was submitted on an agreed statement of facts, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Geiler, J.), dated September 9, 1982, which dismissed the complaint. Judgment affirmed, with costs. The payments in question were made by defendant Michael Chiusano in satisfaction of his liability as joint obligor on the mortgage. As such, they were in payment of an antecedent debt, and cannot constitute a fraudulent conveyance under section 273-a Debt. Cred. of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see Debtor and Creditor Law, § 272, subd a; American Metal Finishers v Palleschi, 55 A.D.2d 499; Matter of International Ribbon Mills [ Arjan Ribbons], 42 A.D.2d 354, revd on other grounds 36 N.Y.2d 121). Gibbons, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ronga v. Chiusano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1983
97 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Ronga v. Chiusano

Case Details

Full title:YANKA K. RONGA, Appellant, v. MICHAEL CHIUSANO, Also Known as MICHELE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Ultramar v. Chase Manhattan

Under the law of this State, a conveyance which satisfies an antecedent debt made while the debtor is…

RDLF Fin. Servs., LLC v. Esquire Capital Corp.

of Settlement with Bernstein and B & B in the New York County action, whereby they paid RDLF two payments…