From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romeo v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1969
31 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

March 3, 1969


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 4, 1968, which denied plaintiff's motion for a pretrial examination of Philip Rosen as a witness and production of relevant books, etc. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the law and the facts, and motion granted. The examination shall be held at Special Term, Part II, Supreme Court, Kings County, on a day and hour to be specified in a written notice of not less than 10 days or at such other place and time as may be agreed upon by the parties. Defendants admit that plaintiff is a general partner. They do not deny that the witness sought to be examined acted in an accounting capacity for the partnership. It has been sufficiently demonstrated that plaintiff has been denied access to the business books and records of the partnership. Plaintiff as a partner had an equal right to manage and conduct the partnership business (Partnership Law, § 40, subd. 5). He had an absolute right to see and examine the partnership business books (Partnership Law, § 41). It has been sufficiently shown that the witness to be examined has knowledge of pertinent facts and is hostile to plaintiff. Under these circumstances, plaintiff should be allowed to examine the witness and any and all records relating to the partnership in his possession (cf. Matter of Macku, 29 A.D.2d 539). Brennan, Acting P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Romeo v. Russo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1969
31 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Romeo v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ROMEO, Appellant, v. PATRICK RUSSO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1969

Citations

31 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Sobel v. Bess

Special Term granted the motion, ordered the examination to take place before a referee and empowered the…