From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 2, 1992
603 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-3106.

September 2, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County; Lacey A. Collier, Judge.

Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, Nancy L. Showalter, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Carolyn J. Mosley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings mandated under Section 775.084(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), when it sentenced appellant as a habitual felony offender, appellant's sentences must be reversed and the case remanded for resentencing. Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 2, 1992
603 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Rome v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH ANTHONY ROME, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 2, 1992

Citations

603 So. 2d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Toombs v. State

§ 775.084(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1989). See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla. 1985); Knickerbocker v. State,…

Gaines v. State

Therefore, the habitual offender sentence imposed herein must be reversed, and the case remanded for…