From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romanello v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 8, 1966
363 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 23300.

July 8, 1966.

A.K. Black, Lake City, Fla., for appellant.

James T. Carlisle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vero Beach, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.


The principal contention in this habeas corpus appeal is that the search which produced the fruits of a robbery that had just occurred in the neighborhood was illegal. We conclude that the search was incident to a lawful arrest, and it was, therefore, legal. With respect to the contention that there had been an illegal detention before appellant was taken before a committing magistrate, it is noted that no facts were alleged in the petition that would warrant the trial court's holding a hearing on the question of voluntariness of the statement made by him to the police officers. Thus, there is no basis for a holding that appellant was deprived of any constitutional right as a result of such detention.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Romanello v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 8, 1966
363 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Romanello v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:Mike ROMANELLO, Appellant, v. Louis L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jul 8, 1966

Citations

363 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Carruth v. Hamm

similarly requires a petitioner to “state the facts supporting each ground” in his petition. See also…