From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Romain v. Frankenmuth Mut

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 24, 2008
482 Mich. 992 (Mich. 2008)

Opinion

No. 135546.

September 24, 2008.

Court of Appeals No. 278591.


Leave to Appeal Granted September 24, 2008.

The motion for rehearing is considered and it is granted. This Court's opinion of July 23, 2008, is vacated. The application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2007, order of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is granted. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether the Legislature's use of the term "proximate cause" in MCL 600.6304 conflicts with other statutory provisions, whether the Legislature intended to impose a legal duty requirement as a precondition for allocating fault under MCL 600.2957 and MCL 600.6304, and whether, if MCL 600.6304 merely codified the common-law doctrine of negligence, a finding of duty is a prerequisite to a finding of fault.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this case on the January 2009 session calendar for argument and submission. Appellant's brief and appendix must be filed no later than November 10, 2008, and appellees' brief and appendix, if appellees choose to submit an appendix, must be filed no later than December 12, 2008.

The Michigan Association for Justice and Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., are invited to file briefs amicus curiae, to be filed no later than December 26, 2008. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae, with such briefs to be filed no later than December 26, 2008.


Summaries of

Romain v. Frankenmuth Mut

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 24, 2008
482 Mich. 992 (Mich. 2008)
Case details for

Romain v. Frankenmuth Mut

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROMAIN and JOANN ROMAIN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 24, 2008

Citations

482 Mich. 992 (Mich. 2008)

Citing Cases

Romain v. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co.

whether the Legislature's use of the term "proximate cause" in MCL 600.6304 conflicts with other statutory…