From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rollins v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Peremptory mandamus order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs. Respondent proposes to erect upon his lot a building with the entrance wall facing the rear of the lot and the opposite or rear wall facing the street. He also proposes to make such wall facing the street thirteen feet higher than the Zoning Ordinance permits the "front" wall of a building in that district to be, although the wall of the entrance side, facing the rear of the lot, is within the permitted height. The height of the building must be measured from the street side of the building. A permit to erect a building to be constructed as planned violates the Zoning Ordinance and may be revoked by appellant. (Building Code of the City of Yonkers, art. I, § 4, subd. 7.) The permit having been illegally granted, no vested right of respondent has been violated. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rollins v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Rollins v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:WARREN F. ROLLINS, Doing Business under the Firm Name of ROLLINS BROS.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 687 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Reichenbach v. Windward

ed Vil. of Ardsley, 152 N.Y.S.2d 195, affd 3 A.D.2d 663; Town of Wheatland v Esso Std. Oil Co., 2 Misc.2d…

Matter of Village Green Center, Inc. v. Reidy

In our opinion, the board was authorized to make the determination, and it properly determined that the…