Summary
In Rogers v. Lewis (Miss.), 144 So. 373, the memorandum decision does not quote the contract which the Texas Company had effected with an alleged agent.
Summary of this case from Johnson v. SteeleOpinion
No. 07-CA-59586.
November 1, 1989.
Appeal No. 136413 from Judgment dated September 30, 1988; Paul G. Alexander, Ruling J., Hinds County Chancery Court, First Judicial District.
Danny Cupit, Cupit Maxey, Jackson, for appellant.
Vaughn Davis, Jr., Royals Hartung Davis, Jackson, for appellee.
Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and SULLIVAN and PITTMAN, JJ.
Affirmed.