From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Brouk

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 17, 2018
No. 17-2912 (8th Cir. Jul. 17, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-2912

07-17-2018

Corey Jemell Rogers Plaintiff - Appellant v. Steven Brouk; John Layton; Donald Hale; John Schneedle; Cindy Griffith; Alan Earls Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Corey Rogers appeals following the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he raises claims of excessive force, deliberate indifference to his medical needs, and sexual assault.

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. --------

After careful review of the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo; viewing record in light most favorable to nonmoving party). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Brouk

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jul 17, 2018
No. 17-2912 (8th Cir. Jul. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Rogers v. Brouk

Case Details

Full title:Corey Jemell Rogers Plaintiff - Appellant v. Steven Brouk; John Layton…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 2018

Citations

No. 17-2912 (8th Cir. Jul. 17, 2018)