From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Brantley

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1956
94 S.E.2d 896 (N.C. 1956)

Opinion

Filed 7 November, 1956.

Appeal and Error 3 — An appeal from orders allowing attorneys of record to withdraw from the case and as commissioners to sell the lands in controversy, and for allowance of reasonable attorney's fees, will be dismissed ex mero motu as fragmentary and premature, the proceeding for the sale of the land being pending in the Superior Court.

APPEAL by petitioner Nancy B. Rogers and by defendant Southern Bond Mortgage Company, Inc., respectively, from Hobgood, J., at Regular March 1956 Term, of WAKE.

Taylor Mitchell for Appellants.

J. L. Emanuel and Robert B. Broughton for Appellees.


JOHNSON, J., not sitting.


Special proceeding instituted 13 January, 1953, for the sale of real estate for partition among petitioners and defendants as tenants in common.

It appears in the record docketed in this Court that in March 1956 petitions were filed: (1) By Robert B. Broughton, to be permitted to withdraw as counsel for petitioners and as commissioner to sell the property involved in the proceeding, and for an allowance of reasonable attorney's fees payable out of the proceeds on deposit with Clerk of Superior Court; and (2) by J. L. Emanuel to be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for G. B. Brantley and Southern Bond Mortgage Company, Inc., and as commissioner, and for an allowance of reasonable attorney's fees as attorney for the said parties; and that upon said petitions orders were entered at March Term 1956, to which petitioners and defendants, respectively, excepted and gave notice of appeal, and appealed to the Supreme Court, and assign error.


It being made to appear to this Court in connection with motion suggesting diminution of record that this special proceeding is still pending in the Superior Court, and that no final judgment has been entered, this Court holds ex mero motu that the appeals are fragmentary and premature, and, therefore, must be dismissed, and it is so ordered, preserving, nevertheless, exceptions of the respective parties to the said orders, staying execution of the orders, and holding in statu quo sufficient funds in the hands of the Clerk of Superior Court for compliance with said orders, if eventually approved, all pending final determination of the proceeding.

Appeal dismissed.

JOHNSON, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Brantley

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1956
94 S.E.2d 896 (N.C. 1956)
Case details for

Rogers v. Brantley

Case Details

Full title:NANCY B. ROGERS AND HUSBAND, L. W. ROGERS, PETITIONERS, v. LECTON…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1956

Citations

94 S.E.2d 896 (N.C. 1956)
94 S.E.2d 896

Citing Cases

Wilkins v. Farah

"It is well established in this jurisdiction that if an appealing party has no right of appeal, an appellate…

Waters v. Personnel, Inc.

The threshold question in Case No. 40, although not argued by either party, is whether an appeal lies from…