From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Boatright

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 19, 2016
No. 15-20354 (5th Cir. Oct. 19, 2016)

Summary

affirming denial of motion to reopen under Rule 60(b) a civil rights case that had been voluntarily dismissed due to the plaintiff's illness

Summary of this case from Lyon v. Gray

Opinion

No. 15-20354

10-19-2016

BRUCE A. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SHAWNA TALBOT BOATRIGHT, Supervisor, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institution Division; JOSE L. GARCIA, JR., Transportation Driver, Security; HERBERT J. GARCIA, Transportation Driver, Security; JOEL GARCIA, Defendants-Appellees


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:10-CV-1058 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Bruce A. Rogers, Texas prisoner # 566928, has appealed the district court's order denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) to reopen this civil rights lawsuit, which was voluntarily dismissed on Rogers's motion. Rogers contends that he has shown that he was prevented from pursuing his civil rights claims by circumstances related to an illness and that the defendants have not shown that they will be prejudiced if his lawsuit is reopened. He argues that he should be permitted to proceed with his civil rights claims in the interests of justice.

Under Rule 60(b)(6), a court may relieve a party from a final judgment for "any other reason that justifies relief." FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(6). Such a motion must be made "'within a reasonable time,' unless good cause can be shown for delay." In re Osborne, 379 F.3d 277, 283 (5th Cir. 2004) (quoting FED. R. CIV. P. 60(c)(1)). A Rule 60(b)(6) motion will be granted only in extraordinary circumstances. Yesh Music v. Lakewood Church, 727 F.3d 356, 363 (5th Cir. 2013). "Accordingly, Rule 60(b)(6) requires a showing of manifest injustice and will not be used to relieve a party from the free, calculated, and deliberate choices he has made." Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). "Rule 60(b)(6) should not be used to undo the damage done by a poor strategic decision." Id.

At most, Rogers's illness provides good cause excusing his 14-month delay in moving for relief under Rule 60(b)(6). Rogers has not shown that the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b)(6) motion will result in a manifest injustice. See id. Extraordinary circumstances requiring relief under Rule 60(b)(6) are not present and have not been shown. See id. The district court's order is

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Boatright

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 19, 2016
No. 15-20354 (5th Cir. Oct. 19, 2016)

affirming denial of motion to reopen under Rule 60(b) a civil rights case that had been voluntarily dismissed due to the plaintiff's illness

Summary of this case from Lyon v. Gray

dismissing an inmate's appeal as frivolous and upholding the lower court's decision to deny Rule 60(b) relief and refuse to reopen a voluntarily dismissed case

Summary of this case from Gonzales v. Franklin
Case details for

Rogers v. Boatright

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE A. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SHAWNA TALBOT BOATRIGHT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 19, 2016

Citations

No. 15-20354 (5th Cir. Oct. 19, 2016)

Citing Cases

Shaw v. Restoration Hardware, Inc.

” Rogers v. Boatright, 670 Fed.Appx. 386, 387 (5th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (quoting Yesh Music v.…

Lyon v. Gray

Here, Plaintiff has not alleged any extraordinary circumstances, and any motion under Rule 60(b) should be…