From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1936
184 S.E. 48 (N.C. 1936)

Opinion

(Filed 26 February, 1936.)

APPEAL by plaintiffs from Cranmer, J., at September Term, 1935, of MARTIN.

B. A. Critcher and J. A. Liverman for Plaintiffs.

Jos. W. Bailey and Hugh G. Horton for defendants.


Civil action to redeem, for an accounting and damages.

Plaintiffs allege that defendants took possession of their lands in 1929, under an agreement to hold the same until the mortgaged indebtedness thereon of $300, then held by defendants, could be paid; that thereafter, in breach of said agreement, attempted foreclosure of tax sales certificate was had and purchase made for defendants; that, in addition, defendants wrongfully attempted foreclosure of their said mortgage; wherefore plaintiffs ask to redeem, for an accounting, and for damages.

The defendants deny the allegations of the complaint and plead the three-year statute of limitations.

The judgment recites that "after hearing the pleadings read and arguments of counsel, upon motion of the defendants to dismiss the action as of nonsuit," the court being of opinion that plaintiffs could not recover, "ordered that the plaintiffs be nonsuited."

Plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.


Reversed on authority of Dix-Downing v. White, 206 N.C. 567, 174 S.E. 451.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1936
184 S.E. 48 (N.C. 1936)
Case details for

Rogers v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON ROGERS ET AL. v. W. L. BAILEY ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1936

Citations

184 S.E. 48 (N.C. 1936)
209 N.C. 849

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Insurance Co.

It is not clear upon what theory the motion was ruled, i.e., whether the issue was finally determined or the…