From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roger v. C.T. Woody

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 30, 2010
395 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1238.

Submitted: September 28, 2010.

Decided: September 30, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:09-cv-00090-MHL).

Deborah Koger, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Ward, Morris Morris, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Deborah Koger appeals the magistrate judge's order granting Defendant's summary judgment motion on her retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge's order. See Koger v. Woody, No. 3:09-cv-00090-MHL, 2010 WL 331759 (E.D.Va. January 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to the exercise of the district court's jurisdiction by a magistrate judge, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Roger v. C.T. Woody

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 30, 2010
395 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Roger v. C.T. Woody

Case Details

Full title:Deborah ROGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.T. WOODY, in his official…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

395 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2010)