From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Thomas

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 3, 2016
137 S. Ct. 166 (2016)

Summary

applying harmless error review in the § 2241 habeas context

Summary of this case from Schwartz v. Hollingsworth

Opinion

No. 16–5029.

10-03-2016

Joseph RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. J.E. THOMAS, Warden, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Thomas

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 3, 2016
137 S. Ct. 166 (2016)

applying harmless error review in the § 2241 habeas context

Summary of this case from Schwartz v. Hollingsworth
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:Joseph RODRIGUEZ, petitioner, v. J.E. THOMAS, Warden, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

137 S. Ct. 166 (2016)
196 L. Ed. 2d 140

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Hollingsworth

Although the Court has found errors in the jury instructions, such errors do not warrant "habeas relief if…