From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 1, 1939
132 S.W.2d 867 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)

Opinion

No. 20537.

Delivered November 1, 1939.

1. — Appeal — Jurisdiction.

Where the record contained a docket entry of notice of appeal, which was not carried into the minutes of the court, Court of Criminal Appeals was without jurisdiction of the appeal.

2. — Same.

Where, on appeal from conviction, it appeared that the recognizance entered into by appellant had been filed, but not carried into the minutes of the trial court, the Court of Criminal Appeals was without jurisdiction, it being essential that such an entry be made in the minutes in order to confer jurisdiction on appellate court.

Appeal from County Court of Brooks County. Hon. J. M. Brooks, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for unlawfully practicing medicine; penalty, fine of $50 and confinement in jail for 10 days.

Appeal dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

J. W. Wilson, of Falfurrias, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is unlawfully practicing medicine; the punishment, a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for 10 days.

Notice of appeal appears not to have been carried into the minutes of the court. Article 827, C. C. P., provides:

"An appeal is taken by giving notice thereof in open court at the term of court at which conviction is had, and having the same entered of record. If notice of appeal is given at the term at which the conviction is had and the same is not entered of record, then by making proof of the fact, the judge of the court trying the cause shall order the same entered of record either in term time or vacation by entering in the minutes of his court an order to that effect. Said entry when so made shall bear date as of date when notice of appeal was actually given in open court."

There appears in the record a docket entry of notice of appeal which was not carried into the minutes of the court. In Casey v. State, 32 S.W.2d 461, this court said:

"The record contains no such notice of appeal as will clothe this court with jurisdiction under Article 827, C. C. P., which requires the notice 'to be entered of record.' The transcript shows a 'docket entry' of notice of appeal, but, if this was ever carried into the court minutes, it is not so shown."

In support of the holding Haynie v. State, 241 S.W. 478, is cited. Under the circumstances, we must hold that we are without jurisdiction.

It is observed that the recognizance entered into by the appellant appears to have been filed, but not carried into the minutes of the court. It was essential that such an entry be made in the minutes in order to confer jurisdiction upon this court.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 1, 1939
132 S.W.2d 867 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:FIDEL RODRIGUEZ v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 1, 1939

Citations

132 S.W.2d 867 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)
132 S.W.2d 867

Citing Cases

Neloms v. State

In the absence of a showing that the docket entry was carried into the minutes of the trial court, this Court…