From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov 30, 2011
75 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4D10–2016.

2011-11-30

Jose RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Stephen Rapp, Judge; L.T. Case No.2004CF005581AXX.Jose Rodriguez, Miami, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Stephen Rapp, Judge; L.T. Case No.2004CF005581AXX.Jose Rodriguez, Miami, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The January 2010 postconviction motion was untimely. State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). Padilla v. Kentucky, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to this 2004 plea. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Nov 30, 2011
75 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jose RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

75 So. 3d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Laude v. State

We affirm the trial court's denial of Laude's Rule 3.850 motion. See Rodriguez v. State, 75 So.3d 391 (Fla.…

Hernandez v. State

. The Second, Fourth, and Fifth Districts have also held that Padilla should not be applied retroactively.…