From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado
Sep 20, 2010
238 P.3d 1283 (Colo. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09SC132.

September 20, 2010.

Certiorari to the Colorado Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals Case No. 05CA2591.

Samler and Whitson, P.C., Eric A. Samler, Denver, CO, Attorney for Petitioner.

John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Katharine J. Gillespie, Assistant Attorney General, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Respondent.


Justice Rice, Justice Coats and Justice Eid are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals in People v. Rodriguez, 209 P.3d 1151 (Colo.App. 2008) should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Hobbs and Justice Martinez are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 35(e).

Justice BENDER does not participate.


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado
Sep 20, 2010
238 P.3d 1283 (Colo. 2010)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. People

Case Details

Full title:Karen S. RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado

Date published: Sep 20, 2010

Citations

238 P.3d 1283 (Colo. 2010)

Citing Cases

People v. Ujaama

See People v. Mershon, 874 P.2d 1025, 1030 n. 2 (Colo.1994) (declining to address state constitutional…

People v. Yakas

At no time did Mr. Yakas express any disagreement with counsel’s representation, nor did he voice an…