From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2004
10 A.D.3d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4104

September 23, 2004.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.


Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J., and a jury), entered September 25, 2003, awarding plaintiff, inter alia, $100,000 for past pain and suffering, $300,000 for future pain and suffering over 25 years and $100,000 for future lost earnings over five years, before structuring, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury's finding that the subject injury to plaintiff's knee, and resulting need for the surgery performed in July 2001, were attributable to the subject construction site accident of February 2000, and not the car accident of June 2001, is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence. The award for future lost earnings over five years is also supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence, including competing expert testimony that while plaintiff will never be able to perform physical labor consistent with his work experience, he is capable of and suited to various types of sedentary work. The awards for past and future pain and suffering do not deviate from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances ( cf. Kircher v. Motel 6 G.P., 305 AD2d 261; Calzado v. New York City Tr. Auth., 304 AD2d 385; Schultz v. Turner Constr. Co., 278 AD2d 76).


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2004
10 A.D.3d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS RODRIGUEZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 551 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 42

Citing Cases

Rios v. City of New York

His injuries included fractures of the pelvis, left femur, left ankle and left wrist and his injuries are not…

Janda v. Michael Rienzi Trust

Dr. Leiken testified as to Mr. Janda's maximum earnings in the year he was injured and presented a basis for…