Opinion
No. 13-55467 D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01135-DMG-JEM
01-17-2014
CHRISTIAN RODRIGUEZ, individually and a class representatives; ALBERTO CAZAREZ, individually and a class representatives, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; CARMEN ANTHONY TRUTANICH; CHARLES BECK; ALLAN NADIR; ANGEL GOMEZ, Defendants - Appellants.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 4, 2013
Pasadena, California
Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Based on the parties' submissions and supplemental briefing, we conclude that this appeal is now moot. See, e.g., Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 398 (1981) (holding that "the question whether a preliminary injunction should have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been fully and irrevocably carried out."). The case is remanded to the district court for any further proceedings.