From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodriguez v. Bank of Am. N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Sep 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-194 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-194

09-08-2016

JORGE RODRIGUEZ, et al, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., et al, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the Court are Defendant AMH Roman Two TX, LLC's ("AMH") Motion to Dismiss and Defendant Bank of America N.A.'s ("Bank of America") Motion to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 4, 10), which had been referred to Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo for a report and recommendation. On August 8, 2016, Judge Palermo issued the Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Motions to Dismiss be granted. The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections were filed.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, AMH's Motion to Dismiss and Bank of America's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 4, 10) are hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims based on RESPA and breach of contract are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' claims for attorneys' fees, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs may amend the Complaint to the extent they can assert any claims other than RESPA or breach of contract.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this the 8th day of September, 2016.

/s/_________

KEITH P. ELLISON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rodriguez v. Bank of Am. N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Sep 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-194 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Rodriguez v. Bank of Am. N.A.

Case Details

Full title:JORGE RODRIGUEZ, et al, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 8, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-194 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2016)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB

Accordingly, Cisneros's claim of wrongful foreclosure against Franklin Credit does not create a cause of…

Glenn v. Vendor Res. Mgmt. & Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

"[Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, (RESPA)] governs the obligations and relationship between borrower…