From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1952
304 N.Y. 591 (N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

Submitted May 19, 1952

Decided May 29, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, KOCH, J.

Roger Hinds for motion and in opposition to cross motion.

Maurice R. Whitebook for cross motion and in opposition to motion.


Motion by defendant granted, and plaintiff's appeal in its entirety dismissed upon the ground that a stipulation for judgment absolute cannot be given in this action for a separation since a counterclaim for annulment remains untried. ( Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N.Y. 150.)

Cross motion by plaintiff granted and defendant's appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Rodgers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1952
304 N.Y. 591 (N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Rodgers

Case Details

Full title:MARY-ALICE RODGERS, Appellant and Respondent, v. WILLIAM H. RODGERS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1952

Citations

304 N.Y. 591 (N.Y. 1952)

Citing Cases

Zientara v. Zientara

Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the…

Statter v. Statter

Estoppel by judgment is a rule of public policy but it is not the whole of our public policy and it must give…