From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 18, 1963
323 F.2d 996 (2d Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 79, Docket 28158.

Argued October 18, 1963.

Decided October 18, 1963.

Jacob Rassner, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Alexander Green, New York City, (Donald M. Dunn, Alfred C. Moran, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.


We affirm the judgment below in open court.

From the testimony of plaintiff in his deposition below it is clear that the accident suffered by him occurred under such circumstances that his sole and exclusive remedy was under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. The complaint below alleged jurisdiction by virtue of the Federal Employers' Liability Act. Thus, the motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. O'Rourke, 344 U.S. 334, 73 S.Ct. 302, 97 L.Ed. 367 (1952).


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Oct 18, 1963
323 F.2d 996 (2d Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:Tom E. RODGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE OHIO RAILROAD CO.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 1963

Citations

323 F.2d 996 (2d Cir. 1963)
1964 A.M.C. 58

Citing Cases

Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corporation

See Ferrigno v. Ocean Transport Ltd., 309 F.2d 445 (2d Cir. 1962); Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring…

Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.

Both the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, Federal Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6), and the…