From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rockwell v. Allman

Supreme Court of Virginia
Mar 8, 1971
211 Va. 560 (Va. 1971)

Opinion

42445 Record No. 7301.

March 8, 1971

Present, All the Justices.

Pleading and Practice — Amendment — Misnomer.

Rockwell filed motion for judgment seeking damages for personal injuries, received in a truck-automobile collision, against Allman as administrator of the estate of the driver of the other vehicle. Defendant filed a responsive pleading, but thereafter established that his appointment was void, because the court lacked jurisdiction to make the appointment, and moved for summary judgment. Not error to overrule Rockwell's motion to amend by substituting correct administratrices who bore no relation to Allman and were never served with process. Misnomer is a mistake in name but not person.

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke. Hon. Frederick L. Hoback, judge presiding.

Affirmed.

W. M. Gravatt, Jr. (Benjamin E. Chapman, on brief), for plaintiff in error.

W. H. Jolly (Kime, Jolly Clemens, on brief), for defendants in error.


On December 15, 1964 Arthur H. Rockwell received personal injuries when a truck he was driving collided with a car operated by Jacie Arbell Underwood Shotwell in Roanoke county. Mrs. Shotwell died as a result of injuries she sustained in the accident. Information supplied by the Division of Motor Vehicles and State police indicated that Mrs. Shotwell resided in the City of Roanoke. Upon motion of Rockwell the Circuit Court of the City of Roanoke, pursuant to the provisions of Code Sec. 64-124 (now Sec. 64.1-131), appointed the City Sergeant, Kermit E. Allman, Administrator of Mrs. Shotwell's estate. On November 14, 1966 Rockwell filed in that court a motion for judgment against Allman seeking damages for his injuries. Allman filed a responsive pleading thereto.

On July 9, 1968, the date set for trial, counsel for Allman introduced evidence that showed Mrs. Shotwell resided in "a mansion house" owned by her in Botetourt county at the time of her death; that on December 21, 1964 Corldeen Frances Berry and Barbara Jean Higgins, daughters of Mrs. Shotwell, qualified as administratrices of her estate in the Circuit Court of Botetourt County, and that the administratrices' final account was filed and approved on August 16, 1965.

On July 30, 1968 Allman filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that his appointment as administrator was void because the court lacked jurisdiction to make the appointment. On the same day Rockwell moved the court to permit him, pursuant to Code Sections 8-97 and 8-119 and Rule 3:13, to amend his motion for judgment "to correct a misnomer" by substituting the administratrices as the party defendant in lieu of Allman. The trial court overruled Rockwell's motion to amend and granted Allman's motion for summary judgment.

The narrow issue presented in this appeal is whether the naming of Allman as the party defendant was a misnomer.

Under the facts of this case there was no misnomer. Allman's appointment was void. Andrews v. Avory, et als., 55 Va. (14 Gratt.) 229, 236 (1858). Any judgment rendered against him as Mrs. Shotwell's administrator would be a nullity. The actual administratrices whom Rockwell sought to substitute for Allman as party defendant bear no relation of interest to Allman and were never served with process. A misnomer is a mistake in name, but not person. Here the wrong person was named and it cannot be corrected under Sec. 8-97 by labelling it a misnomer.

Our holding in Jacobson v. Southern Biscuit Company, 198 Va. 813, 97 S.E.2d 1 (1957), is not to the contrary. There we permitted an amendment to the pleadings because the right party was before the court "although under a wrong name". Here the party before the court, Kermit F. Allman, Administrator, was not the right party because his appointment as administrator was void.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rockwell v. Allman

Supreme Court of Virginia
Mar 8, 1971
211 Va. 560 (Va. 1971)
Case details for

Rockwell v. Allman

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR H. ROCKWELL v. KERMIT E. ALLMAN, ADMR., ETC., ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Mar 8, 1971

Citations

211 Va. 560 (Va. 1971)
179 S.E.2d 471

Citing Cases

Hampton v. Meyer

A misnomer is a mistake in the name, not the identification, of a party. SeeRockwell v. Allman , 211 Va. 560,…

Richmond v. Volk

A misnomer is a mistake in the name, not the identification, of a party. See Rockwell v. Allman, 211 Va. 560,…