upholding a district court's determination that witness's statements describing how supervisor made it known that "he disliked the plaintiff and used her as the butt of office jokes, are consistent with personal dislike rather than discriminatory animus"
Summary of this case from Ervin v. Nashville Peace Justice CenterNo. 98-850.
January 19, 1999, OCTOBER TERM, 1998.
C.A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 150 F. 3d 1354.
upholding a district court's determination that witness's statements describing how supervisor made it known that "he disliked the plaintiff and used her as the butt of office jokes, are consistent with personal dislike rather than discriminatory animus"
Summary of this case from Ervin v. Nashville Peace Justice Centerupholding a district court's determination that witness's statements describing how supervisor made it known that "he disliked the plaintiff and used her as the butt of office jokes, are consistent with personal dislike rather than discriminatory animus"
Summary of this case from Ervin v. Nashville Peace Justice CenterFull title:ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. CELERITAS TECHNOLOGIES, LTD
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 19, 1999
Couture, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., No. 04 Civ. 7203, 2006 WL 2591478, at *4-*5 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (collecting…
Tracy v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.A patent claim is invalid if it is anticipated. See Celeritas Tech. Ltd. v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., 150 F.3d…