From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roche v. McColgan

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jul 25, 1947
80 Cal.App.2d 983 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)

Opinion

Docket No. 7342.

July 25, 1947.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. Affirmed.

Sullivan, Roche, Johnson Farraher and Eustace Cullinan for Appellant.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and James E. Sabine, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.


THE COURT.

It appears from the stipulation of the parties that the same legal questions are presented in this proceeding as those in Cullinan v. McColgan, 3 Civ. No. 7341, ante, page 976 [ 183 P.2d 115], this day filed.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case the judgment herein is affirmed.

Appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 22, 1947. Shenk, J., and Traynor, J., voted for a hearing.


Summaries of

Roche v. McColgan

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jul 25, 1947
80 Cal.App.2d 983 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)
Case details for

Roche v. McColgan

Case Details

Full title:THEO. J. ROCHE, Appellant, v. CHARLES J. McCOLGAN, as State Franchise Tax…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Jul 25, 1947

Citations

80 Cal.App.2d 983 (Cal. Ct. App. 1947)
183 P.2d 119

Citing Cases

Adoption of Parker

I think also that in a case such as this, where upon the facts and the law, the choice of this court for an…