From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roca Labs, Inc. v. Consumer Op. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 16, 2014
Case No. 8:14-cv-2096-T-33EAJ (M.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2014)

Summary

denying the plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction in a defamation and tortious-interference action

Summary of this case from Kazal v. Price

Opinion

Case No. 8:14-cv-2096-T-33EAJ

11-16-2014

ROCA LABS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CONSUMER OPINION CORP., and OPINION CORP., Defendants.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court pursuant to the October 28, 2014, Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth A. Jenkins, United States Magistrate Judge, (Doc. # 43), in which Judge Jenkins recommends that Plaintiff Roca Lab Inc.'s Verified Motion for Entry of a Temporary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. # 5) be denied. As of this date, there has been no objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for Roca Labs Inc. to file such objection has passed.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Hous. v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) The Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth A. Jenkins, United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 43) is ADOPTED. (2) Roca Lab Inc.'s Verified Motion for Entry of a Temporary Injunction and Supporting Memorandum of Law (Doc. # 5) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, this 16th day of November, 2014.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Roca Labs, Inc. v. Consumer Op. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Nov 16, 2014
Case No. 8:14-cv-2096-T-33EAJ (M.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2014)

denying the plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction in a defamation and tortious-interference action

Summary of this case from Kazal v. Price
Case details for

Roca Labs, Inc. v. Consumer Op. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROCA LABS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CONSUMER OPINION CORP., and OPINION CORP.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 16, 2014

Citations

Case No. 8:14-cv-2096-T-33EAJ (M.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 2014)

Citing Cases

Kazal v. Price

Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 559 (1976) (collecting decisions). Under the First Amendment, a…