From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Robinson

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 11, 1942
80 F. Supp. 397 (D.D.C. 1942)

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 11348.

June 11, 1942.

B.V. Lawson, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Joel D. Blackwell, of Washington, D.C., for defendant.


Action by Louise Robinson against Milton Robinson. Joel D. Blackwell, an attorney appointed to defend, sought to recover his fee by way of contempt proceedings.

Motion for adjudication in contempt denied.


In this case the attorney appointed to defend seeks to recover his fee by way of contempt proceedings.

Defendant Milton Robinson was duly served with process but failed to appear and Mr. Blackwell was appointed as attorney to defend under section 982 of the 1901 Code, now section 16 — 418 of the 1940 Code.

This section provides that an attorney so appointed shall receive such compensation for his services as the court may determine to be proper, such compensation to be paid by the parties as the court may direct.

In the present case the final decree granting a divorce to plaintiff ordered defendant to pay a fee to the attorney appointed to defend.

In Rapeer v. Colpoys, 66 App. D.C. 216, 85 F.2d 715 the Court of Appeals held that a fee could not be collected by means of imprisonment unless the statute authorizing payment of the fee expressly so required. There is no such provision in the statute here relied upon.

I am unable to distinguish this case from the Rapeer case and therefore the motion for adjudication in contempt is denied.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Robinson

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 11, 1942
80 F. Supp. 397 (D.D.C. 1942)
Case details for

Robinson v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:ROBINSON v. ROBINSON

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 11, 1942

Citations

80 F. Supp. 397 (D.D.C. 1942)