From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 17, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1452 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-17-2016

In the Matter of Kendale ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Kendale Robinson, Comstock, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Kendale Robinson, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of possessing drugs and smuggling. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this proceeding has been rendered moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Shields v. Prack, 131 A.D.3d 774, 775, 14 N.Y.S.3d 720 [2015] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., EGAN JR., ROSE and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 17, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1452 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Robinson v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Kendale ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 17, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1452 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1896
26 N.Y.S.3d 722

Citing Cases

Tolliver v. Fischer

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Ramirez v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has now been administratively reversed,…