From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-841-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jan. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-841-TMH

01-27-2012

JAMES L. ROBINSON, #121865, Petitioner, v. ANDY HUGHES, et al., Respondents.


WO


FINAL JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the prior proceedings, opinions and orders entered in this case, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of the respondents and against the petitioner and that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Truman M. Hobbs

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Robinson v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-841-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jan. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Robinson v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. ROBINSON, #121865, Petitioner, v. ANDY HUGHES, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-841-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jan. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Valenza

After exhausting available state remedies, [the petitioner] may pursue federal habeas proceedings.Robinson v.…

Davis v. McCovery

After exhausting available state remedies, [the petitioner] may pursue federal habeas proceedings.Robinson v.…