From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2289 DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2289 DAD (PC)

01-19-2012

KENNETH VERNON ROBINSON, II Petitioner, v. R, GROUNDS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 5, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Petitioner has not opposed the motion.

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." On October 4, 2011, petitioner was advised of the deadline for filing an opposition to a motion to dismiss.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that respondent's motion be granted and this action dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations.

____________________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Robinson v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 19, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2289 DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Robinson v. Grounds

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH VERNON ROBINSON, II Petitioner, v. R, GROUNDS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 19, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2289 DAD (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2012)