From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Dryden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 24, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:18CV892-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 24, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:18CV892-HEH

06-24-2019

WILLIAM ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. DR. DRYDEN, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on May 17, 2019, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. The Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: June 24, 2019
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Robinson v. Dryden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 24, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:18CV892-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 24, 2019)
Case details for

Robinson v. Dryden

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. DR. DRYDEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jun 24, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:18CV892-HEH (E.D. Va. Jun. 24, 2019)

Citing Cases

Wrigley v. Wrigley

(1) In a case where fraud is charged, fraud is not presumed, but must be proved, and the burden of proof is…

Ebert v. Myers

(1) Fraud must be proved and cannot be presumed. Robinson v. Dryden, 118 Mo. 538; Renney v. Williams, 89 Mo.…