From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robillard v. Robbins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 1105 (N.Y. 1991)

Opinion

Argued October 16, 1991

Decided November 25, 1991

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Robert F. Doran, J.

James L. Pemberton for appellants. Harold D. Gordon for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

While defendants urge that it was error to allow plaintiff's medical expert to express opinions on the very questions to be resolved by the jury, their general objections were insufficient to preserve a law issue for our review (see, Matter of Gonzalez v State Liq. Auth., 30 N.Y.2d 108, 112-113; Wightman v Campbell, 217 N.Y. 479, 482-483).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Robillard v. Robbins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 25, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 1105 (N.Y. 1991)
Case details for

Robillard v. Robbins

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET M. ROBILLARD, Respondent, v. DEAN ROBBINS, III, et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 25, 1991

Citations

78 N.Y.2d 1105 (N.Y. 1991)
578 N.Y.S.2d 126
585 N.E.2d 375

Citing Cases

Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp.

nal liability to be imposed on a corporate officer for misfeasance or malfeasance, i.e., an affirmative…

Weaver v. Howard

We disagree and accordingly reverse. The proffered medical opinion, based at least in part upon an objective…