observing that nonbusiness income is "allocated in a manner whereby it is taxed only by the state with which the asset that generated the income is most closely associated"
Summary of this case from May Department Stores Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueNo. 98-1377.
May 3, 1999, October TERM, 1998.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 161 F. 3d 292.
observing that nonbusiness income is "allocated in a manner whereby it is taxed only by the state with which the asset that generated the income is most closely associated"
Summary of this case from May Department Stores Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueFull title:ROBERTSON ET UX. v. NEUROMEDICAL CENTER ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 3, 1999
Hunt Corp., 709 N.E.2d at 771. See also I.C. §§ 6-3-2-2(g) to -2(k) (allocation rules); Polaroid Corp. v.…
Wilson v. Executive Jet Management Inc.Thus, according to Defendant, Plaintiff's claim that it regarded him as disabled must fail (Id.). Defendant…