Opinion
November 12, 1935.
1. — Evidence. Appellate courts will take judicial cognizance as to the duly elected, qualified and acting judge of the different judicial circuits.
2. — Exceptions, Bills of. Judge, who heard cause having gone out of office, is without authority to authenticate bill of exceptions, since under Section 1012, R.S. 1929, such bill of exceptions must be signed by the succeeding judge of the court where case was tried.
3. — Appeal and Error. Where there is no claim of error in record proper, appellate court cannot consider assignments of error or matters of exception in absence of bill of exceptions.
Appeal from Circuit Court of Nodaway County. — Hon. D.D. Reeves, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Pettijohn Eiser for appellant.
A.F. Harvey for respondent.
Plaintiff brought this suit seeking to recover damages for the breach of a contract. This record proper discloses that the cause was tried on October 17, 1933, before Hon. D.D. REEVES, Judge of the fourth judicial circuit, of which Nodaway county is a part, and a jury; and that the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. From a judgment entered upon the verdict, the plaintiff has appealed.
The respondent has called attention to the fact that the bill of exceptions, set forth in the plaintiff's abstract of the record filed in this court, was signed by Judge REEVES on February 9, 1935, and that at that time Hon THOMAS A. CUMMINS was the duly elected, qualified and acting judge of the fourth judicial circuit. We judicially know that Judge CUMMINS was elected judge of the fourth judicial circuit at the election in November, 1934; that he duly qualified and was acting as such judge of the Nodaway County Circuit Court in January and February, 1935. [State ex rel. Seibert, 32 S.W. 670, 130 Mo. 202; Mayes v. Palmer, 103 S.W. 1140, 206 Mo. 293; Swavey v. Boyers, 71 S.W.2d 110.]
Section 1012, Revised Statutes 1929, provides that in any case where the judge who heard the cause is not in office at the time the bill of exceptions is presented that such bill, if correct, shall be signed "by the succeeding or acting judge of the court where the case was heard." Under the provisions of this section Judge REEVES was without authority to authenticate the bill of exceptions. [State v. Grant, 124 Mo. App. 129, 100 S.W. 1113; State v. McLain, 18 S.W.2d 16.]
The sole assignment of error relates to the action of the court in directing a verdict for the defendant. In the absence of a bill of exceptions we cannot consider the assignment, nor can we consider any matter of exception. The plaintiff does not claim that there is error in the record proper. The judgment is affirmed. Reynolds, C., concurs.
The foregoing opinion of CAMPBELL, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment is affirmed. All concur.