Opinion
28033.
DECIDED FEBRUARY 28, 1940.
Complaint; from Fulton civil court — appellate division. September 7, 1939.
R. B. Pullen, for plaintiff in error. G. B. Tidwell, contra.
1. The evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to authorize a finding that if the purchase of the property was unauthorized in the first instance, the defendant, by her conduct, had estopped herself to deny that the property sued for was purchased for her benefit and in her behalf.
Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.