From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 14, 1960
161 A.2d 456 (Md. 1960)

Opinion

[App. No. 5, September Term, 1960 (Adv.).]

Decided June 14, 1960.

POST CONVICTION PROCEDURE ACT — Evidence, Sufficiency Of — Arrest, Legality Of. Contentions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of an arrest are not available in a post conviction proceeding. p. 639

J.E.B.

Decided June 14, 1960.

Bobby William Roberts instituted a proceeding under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, and from a denial of relief, he applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Reporter's Note: Certiorari denied, 364 U.S. 850.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.


Petitioner's application for leave to appeal under the Post Conviction Procedure Act is denied for the reasons set forth by the court below. Petitioner's contentions challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the arrest and are not available to him in this proceeding.

Application denied.


Summaries of

Roberts v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 14, 1960
161 A.2d 456 (Md. 1960)
Case details for

Roberts v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTS v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jun 14, 1960

Citations

161 A.2d 456 (Md. 1960)
161 A.2d 456

Citing Cases

Ralph v. Pepersack

se silver platter doctrine", really the rule in Rea v. United States, 350 U.S. 214, 76 S.Ct. 292, 100 L.Ed.…

Fennell v. Warden

In his petition and amendment thereto (Maryland Rule BK41 d), the petitioner made four contentions: (1) that…