From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robert T. v. Sproat

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Apr 3, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 69385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2011-03469 M154004

04-03-2013

In the Matter of Robert T. (Anonymous), petitioner, v. Christine A. Sproat, etc., et al., respondents.


, P.J.

REINALDO E. RIVERA

LEONARD B. AUSTIN

SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

On the Court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 1, 2013, and the decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 6, 2013, in the above-entitled appeal are recalled and vacated and the following decision and order on motion is substituted therefor:

Motion by Christine A. Sproat and Michael Hogan for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from an opinion and judgment of this Court dated November 28, 2012, which determined a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, and the following question is certified to the Court of Appeals: Was the opinion and judgment of this Court dated November 28, 2012, properly made?

Questions of law have arisen, which, in our opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals (see CPLR 5713).

ENG, P.J., RIVERA, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Robert T. v. Sproat

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Apr 3, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 69385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Robert T. v. Sproat

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Robert T. (Anonymous), petitioner, v. Christine A…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 69385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Citing Cases

Allen B. v. Sproat

Finally, he disputed the majority's characterization of the effective-evaluation provision as “an ex parte…