From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberdeaux v. Evangelical Homes of Mich. (In re Estate of Roberdeaux)

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 30, 2017
897 N.W.2d 164 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154832 COA: 323802

06-30-2017

IN RE ESTATE OF Linda ROBERDEAUX. Dennis Roberdeaux, Sr., Personal Representative, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Evangelical Homes of Michigan, d/b/a Evangelical Home–Saline, and Michigan Sports Medicine & Orthopedic Center, Defendants, and Washtenaw Medicine, P.C., d/b/a Washtenaw Internal Medicine Associates, Cheryl A. Huckins, M.D., and Mark A. Kelley, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Markman, C.J. (dissenting.)

I would reverse for the reasons set forth by Judge SERVITTO in her Court of Appeals dissent. In re Roberdeaux Estate , unpublished opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued October 18, 2016 (Docket No. 323802) ( SERVITTO , J., dissenting). A "standard of care" expert in a medical malpractice action must have "devoted a majority of his or her professional time to ... [t]he active clinical practice of the same health profession in which the party ... on whose behalf the testimony is offered" practices. MCL 600.2169(1)(b)(i ). In Woodard v. Custer , 476 Mich. 545, 560 (2006), this Court held that an expert "must match the one most relevant standard of practice or care—the specialty engaged in by the defendant physician during the course of the alleged malpractice ...." And in Woodard 's companion case, Hamilton v. Kuligowski , we struck plaintiff's expert's testimony when defendant was a specialist in internal medicine and plaintiff's expert specialized in infectious diseases, a subspecialty of internal medicine. Id . at 577–578. Largely the same reasoning applies here. Defendant practiced general internal medicine, while her expert practiced geriatrics, a subspecialty of internal medicine. Under Woodard and Hamilton , the testimony of defendant's expert should not have been admitted.

Bernstein, J., did not participate due to his prior relationship with the Sam Bernstein Law Firm.

Wilder, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.


Summaries of

Roberdeaux v. Evangelical Homes of Mich. (In re Estate of Roberdeaux)

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jun 30, 2017
897 N.W.2d 164 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

Roberdeaux v. Evangelical Homes of Mich. (In re Estate of Roberdeaux)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ESTATE OF Linda ROBERDEAUX. Dennis Roberdeaux, Sr., Personal…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jun 30, 2017

Citations

897 N.W.2d 164 (Mich. 2017)
500 Mich. 1025