From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robbins v. Rophie Shoes, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 10, 1982
413 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AJ-94.

May 10, 1982.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

William C. Kaleel, Jr. of Kaleel Kaleel, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert M. Todd of Lyle Skipper, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellees.


Claimant appeals from a workers' compensation order dismissing her claim because Section 440.15(3)(b)3d, Florida Statutes (1981), bars the payment of wage loss benefits to an employee who has reached the age of 65 and becomes eligible for social security benefits. We affirm.

Claimant contends Section 440.15(3)(b)3d, Florida Statutes (1981), is unconstitutional. We decline to rule on this issue because claimant lacks standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Section. The record in this case is devoid of evidence showing that claimant is entitled to wage loss benefits. See Eckerd Corp. v. Coker, 411 So.2d 1026, 1982.

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robbins v. Rophie Shoes, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 10, 1982
413 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Robbins v. Rophie Shoes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HELEN ROBBINS, APPELLANT, v. ROPHIE SHOES, INC. AND ALBERT ROPHIE, D/B/A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 10, 1982

Citations

413 So. 2d 839 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

S.E. Volusia Hosp. v. St. Dept., Ins

E.M. Watkins Co., Inc. v. Board of Regents, 414 So.2d 583, 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). See also Rhaney v. Dobbs…

Sasso v. Ram Property Management

The requirement of standing has been strictly enforced by this court in other cases assaulting the wage-loss…