From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roach v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

U.S.
May 31, 1910
218 U.S. 159 (1910)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

No. 151.

Argued April 14, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910.

Decided on the authority of the preceding case.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. James T. Blair, with whom Mr. Elliott W. Major, Attorney General of the State of Missouri, and Mr. Charles G. Revelle were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. M.A. Low, with whom Mr. E.C. Lindley was on the brief, for appellees in No. 150.fn1 Mr. Gardiner Lathrop, with whom Mr. Robert Dunlap, Mr. Thomas R. Morrow and Mr. James P. Gilmore were on the brief, for appellee in No. 151.fn1

See abstracts of arguments in preceding case with which this was argued simultaneously.



This case was argued at the same time with No. 150, and involves the validity of the statute of March 13, 1907. The case was also decided upon demurrer to the bill. The allegations of the bill and supplemental bill showed that the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company was within the State of Missouri in compliance with its laws; that it had acquired a large amount of property therein; that, being a foreign corporation, it had removed suits from a State to the Federal court, and the company averred that for that reason its right to do business in the State of Missouri was about to be revoked by the action of the secretary of state. This case comes within the principles just laid down in No. 150, and the decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Roach v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

U.S.
May 31, 1910
218 U.S. 159 (1910)
Case details for

Roach v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROACH, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, v . ATCHISON, TOPEKA…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 31, 1910

Citations

218 U.S. 159 (1910)

Citing Cases

Wuchter v. Pizzutti

Chambers v. B. O.R.R., 207 U.S. 142; Cole v. Cunningham, 133 U.S. 107; Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall. 168; Sou.…

Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Glander

See Chicago, M. St. P.R. Co. v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418; Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe R. Co. v. Ellis, 165, U.S.…