From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivera v. Our Lady of Knox Roman Catholic Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1993
197 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 21, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Greene County (Cobb, J.).


On February 9, 1989, plaintiff Orlando Rivera, Jr. sustained personal injuries when he fell approximately six feet from a scaffold to the ground. He was an inmate at Greene Correctional Facility in Greene County assigned to a work detail at defendant Our Lady of Knox Roman Catholic Church and has no recollection of any of the events surrounding the accident. The fall was observed by a clergyman, Father Jeremiah Nunan, who when deposed testified that Rivera fell head first and made no effort to protect himself or to break the fall. Following completion of discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment by establishing a prima facie case as to the adequacy of the scaffold, safety of the work site, and that defendants exercised no control or supervision of the construction project.

Plaintiffs predicated their opposition to the motion solely upon their need to depose two witnesses who had observed the accident. As aptly stated by defendants, plaintiffs knew the identity of the witnesses at all times. One of those witnesses was Correction Officer Frank Anatovich, who oversaw the work detail and remained available for a deposition at Greene Correctional Facility. No effort was made to depose Anatovich or the other witness, Pat Gordon, another inmate. Plaintiffs' only effort to contact Gordon was a telephone call to the State Division of Parole on May 14, 1991. Although plaintiffs' attorney was informed that Gordon's address would be available upon receipt of a court order, no such order was ever sought. In sum, plaintiffs made no more than a minimal token effort to locate the witnesses during the two-year pendency of the case.

A motion for summary judgment cannot be defeated solely on the grounds that additional discovery is needed if the opposing party, by his or her own inaction, has failed to investigate and ascertain the facts (Meath v. Mishrick, 68 N.Y.2d 992, 994-995; Sheehan v. Columbia Presbyt. Med. Ctr., Presbyt. Hosp., 182 A.D.2d 556; Edwards v. Terryville Meat Co., 178 A.D.2d 580, 581; Fine Arts Enters. v. Levy, 149 A.D.2d 795, 796). Given that the record amply demonstrates that plaintiffs' failure to ascertain the facts was due solely to their own inaction, defendants' motion was properly granted.

Mercure, Cardona, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Rivera v. Our Lady of Knox Roman Catholic Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1993
197 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Rivera v. Our Lady of Knox Roman Catholic Church

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO RIVERA, JR., et al., Appellants, v. OUR LADY OF KNOX ROMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 764 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 725

Citing Cases

State v. County of Erie

Plaintiff met its initial burden of establishing entitlement to partial summary judgment as a matter of law,…

Johnson v. Sniffen [2d Dept 1999

We further note that in response to this 1998 motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs requested an…