From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rita v. U.S.

U.S.
Nov 3, 2006
549 U.S. 1016 (2006)

Summary

granting writ of certiorari to decide whether affording presumption of reasonableness to sentences within guidelines range is consistent with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Marshall

Opinion

No. 06-5754.

November 3, 2006.

Reported below: 177 Fed. Appx. 357.


Certiorari Granted

C.A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: "(1) Was the District Court's choice of within-Guidelines sentence reasonable? (2) In making that determination, is it consistent with United States v. Booker, 543 U. S. 220 (2005), to accord a presumption of reasonableness to within-Guidelines sentences? (3) If so, can that presumption justify a sentence imposed without an explicit analysis by the District Court of the 18 U. S C. § 3553(a) factors and any other factors that might justify a lesser sentence?"


Summaries of

Rita v. U.S.

U.S.
Nov 3, 2006
549 U.S. 1016 (2006)

granting writ of certiorari to decide whether affording presumption of reasonableness to sentences within guidelines range is consistent with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Marshall

granting writ of certiorari to decide whether according a presumption of reasonableness to within-guidelines sentences is consistent with Booker

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tostado-Sianez

granting certiorari to decide whether affording presumption of reasonableness to sentence within guidelines range is consistent with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Washington

raising question whether any presumption of reasonableness is consistent with Booker

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Vallejo
Case details for

Rita v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:RITA v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 3, 2006

Citations

549 U.S. 1016 (2006)
127 S. Ct. 551

Citing Cases

Tyra v. United States

Tyra claims that reasonably competent counsel would have filed — as did counsel for another defendant in a…

U.S.A. v. Nitch

We recognize that the Supreme Court has issued a writ of certiorari to determine whether presumptions like…