From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. County of Cochise

Court of Appeals of Arizona
Jun 11, 1969
455 P.2d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 2 CA-CIV 650.

June 11, 1969.

Appeal by county attorney from entry of a declaratory judgment in favor of county and its board of supervisors by the Superior Court, Cochise County, Cause No. 24717, Jack D.H. Hays, J. The Court of Appeals, Molloy, C.J., held that county attorney had no real interest in opposing declaration sought by county board of supervisors, namely, that they were legally empowered to secure a legal opinion from any member of the county bar association and to pay for such legal services from unencumbered funds; accordingly, the requisite "adversity" to maintenance of a declaratory judgment action was lacking in the complaint, thereby depriving it of the legal efficacy to invoke the Superior Court's jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Richard J. Riley, Cochise County Atty., Bisbee, by Alan L. Slaughter, Chief Deputy Atty., for appellant.


This is an appeal from a judgment which ordered and decreed that the Board of Supervisors of Cochise County were legally empowered to secure a legal opinion from any member of the County Bar Association and to pay for such legal services from unencumbered funds. The pertinent allegations of the complaint filed by the appellees against the appellant as Cochise County Attorney are as follows:

That the Cochise County Board of Supervisors passed a resolution authorizing the chairman to secure a legal opinion relative to the legal operating status of the Cochise County Health Department from a member of the Cochise County Bar Association; that the defendant County Attorney had objected to the proposed practice of securing legal advice from outside counsel and threatened to sue under the provisions of A.R.S. § 11-641 if funds were expended for such outside counsel; that the Board's position was that its proposed action in retaining counsel was authorized; and that these circumstances created a justiciable controversy in which a judgment would terminate the controversy.

We are of the opinion that this complaint suffers the same infirmity as the complaint in Riley v. County of Cochise, 9 Ariz. App. 55, 455 P.2d 1005, released simultaneously herewith.

For the reasons therein stated, this appeal is dismissed.

HATHAWAY and KRUCKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Riley v. County of Cochise

Court of Appeals of Arizona
Jun 11, 1969
455 P.2d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

Riley v. County of Cochise

Case Details

Full title:Richard J. RILEY, as County Attorney of Cochise County, State of Arizona…

Court:Court of Appeals of Arizona

Date published: Jun 11, 1969

Citations

455 P.2d 1010 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1969)
455 P.2d 1010

Citing Cases

Riley v. County of Cochise

Appeal dismissed. See, also, Ariz. App., 455 P.2d 1010. Richard J. Riley, Cochise County Atty., Bisbee, by…

Board of Sup'rs of Maricopa Cty. v. Woodall

The County Attorney contends that there is no justiciable controversy between the Board and the Clerk and…