From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. California

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 17, 2014
571 U.S. 1161 (2014)

Summary

holding warrantless searches of digital contents of a cell phone seized incident to arrest are categorically permitted

Summary of this case from Britt v. Anderson

Opinion

No. 13–132.

2014-01-17

David Leon RILEY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.


Case below, 2013 WL 475242.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, granted limited to the following question: Whether evidence admitted at petitioner's trial was obtained in a search of petitioner's cell phone that violated petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights.


Summaries of

Riley v. California

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 17, 2014
571 U.S. 1161 (2014)

holding warrantless searches of digital contents of a cell phone seized incident to arrest are categorically permitted

Summary of this case from Britt v. Anderson
Case details for

Riley v. California

Case Details

Full title:David Leon RILEY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 17, 2014

Citations

571 U.S. 1161 (2014)
134 S. Ct. 999
187 L. Ed. 2d 847
82 U.S.L.W. 3082

Citing Cases

United States v. Clark

Finally, as Magistrate Judge Lee noted in her Report and Recommendation, the United States Supreme Court…

State v. Granville

We will not do so either, but we do note that two separate certiorari petitions have been granted by the…