From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richter v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 16, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Brien, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

By submitting evidence demonstrating that he was not involved in the automobile accident which is the subject of this action, the third-party defendant established a prima facie right to judgment as a matter of law. The defendants third-party plaintiffs failed to submit evidence raising a genuine issue of fact (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562), and, instead, relied upon evidence that was based on speculation, conjecture, and surmise. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the third-party defendant's motion (see, Miller v. JWP Forest Elec. Corp., 232 A.D.2d 615; Abbenante v Tyree Co., 228 A.D.2d 529; All Indus. Real Estate Corp. v. Northgate Plaza, 186 A.D.2d 103).

Miller, J.P., Copertino, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richter v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1997
240 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Richter v. Herman

Case Details

Full title:GAIL I. RICHTER et al., Plaintiffs, v. GREGORY P. HERMAN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 556 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 983

Citing Cases

Stanzoni Realty v. Landmark Prop

naford Bros. Co., 295 AD2d 554; Friedland Realty v. Piazza, 273 AD2d 351; Graff v. Billet, 101 AD2d 355, affd…

Flood v. Akmal

The evidence submitted by the Albertos and Bohemia in support of their respective cross motions for summary…